• 検索結果がありません。

証券化市場の動向調査 | 日本証券業協会

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2018

シェア "証券化市場の動向調査 | 日本証券業協会"

Copied!
6
0
0

読み込み中.... (全文を見る)

全文

(1)

November 29, 2013 Japan Securities Dealers Association Japanese Bankers Association

Securitization Market Trends Survey Report —Issuance Trends in the First Half of Fiscal 2013—

The following report is a summary of the results of the “Securitization Market Trends Survey” (see JSDA’s website at <http://www.jsda.or.jp/en/index.html>), conducted monthly by the Japan Securities Dealers Association (JSDA) and the Japanese Bankers Association (JBA), for the first half of fiscal 2013, the period from April 1, 2013 to September 30, 2013. For chart data, please see the appendix “Chart Data at a Glance.”

I. Overall Issuance Trends for Securitization Products

Looking at the issuance trends for securitization products in the first half of 2013, amount of issues declined year on year. Total issuance amount was ¥1,294.1 billion, declining 16% from the first half of fiscal 2012, while the number of issues was 53, up 39% year on year (Chart 1).

Ref.: The total issuance amount of corporate straight bonds during the first half of fiscal 2013 was ¥4,866.9 billion (provisional figure).

Chart 1. Securitization Product Issuance Amount and Number of Issues

2.3 2.9 3.4 4.8 4.6 5.2

3.4 3.4 2.3

1.4 1.6 1.3

1.2 1.4 1.9

1.5 1.5 1.3 1.3 138 158 145 167 146 168 134 127 110 94 79 67 54 53 48 43 38 52 53 0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8

04/1H 04/2H 05/1H 05/2H 06/1H 06/2H 07/1H 07/2H 08/1H 08/2H 09/1H 09/2H 10/1H 10/2H 11/1H 11/2H 12/1H 12/2H 13/1H

(¥trillion) (issues)

Issuance amount (left scale)

(2)

II. Issuance Trends by Underlying Assets

Looking at the securitization product issuance amount for the first half of fiscal 2013 by underlying assets, the amount of CDO, leases, shopping credits increased. In contrast, RMBS, CMBS, sales receivables/commercial bills and others decreased. There were no consumer loans issues (see Chart 2).

Chart 2. Securitization Product Issuance Amount by Underlying Assets

* YoY change in CDO is shown as “—“ because there were no issues in the same period last year.

Reference: The specific types of underlying assets for each securitization product category are as follows.

RMBS (Residential Mortgage Backed Securities): Housing loans and loans to individuals to build

commercial apartments

CMBS (Commercial Mortgage Backed Securities): Commercial real estate collateralized loans, commercial

real estate

CDO (Collateralized Debt Obligations): Corporate loans, corporate bonds, credit default swaps, and others

Leases: Lease credits

Consumer loans: Consumer loans, bank card loans

Shopping credits: Shopping loans, credit card loans, automobile loans

Sales receivables/Commercial bills: Sales receivables, commercial bills

Others: Fund receivables, business cash flow, medical fee receivables, and others

0 1 2 3 4 5 6

04/1H 04/2H 05/1H 05/2H 06/1H 06/2H 07/1H 07/2H 08/1H 08/2H 09/1H 09/2H 10/1H 10/2H 11/1H 11/2H 12/1H 12/2H 13/1H

(¥trillion)

Others

Sales receivables/Commercial bills

Shopping credits

Consumer loans

Leases

CDO

CMBS

RMBS

RMBS CMBS CDO Leases Consumer

loans

Shopping credits

Sales receivables/

Commercial bills

Others Total

Issu an c e amo u n t( \ 1 0 0 millio n ) 1 0 ,7 6 0 5 1 3 285 0 1 ,0 0 7 3 6 0 5 1 0 1 2 ,9 4 1

Ye ar o n ye ar c h an ge ( \ 1 0 0 ▲3 8 7 ▲1 3 5 1 3 6 5 ▲5 2 0 28 ▲1 5 ▲1 ,4 9 2 ▲2 ,4 4 4

Ye ar o n ye ar c h an ge ( % ) ▲3 ▲9 6 - ( ※) +3 0 ▲1 0 0 +3 ▲4 ▲7 5 ▲1 6

%  Compos ition 8 3 0 0 2 0 8 3 4 1 0 0

(3)

RMBS Issuance Trends (i) By Originator

Looking at the RMBS issuance amount (¥ 1,076.0billion) by originator, the Japan Housing Finance Agency (JHF) accounted for 78% (¥844.3 billion) of the total (Chart 3).

Chart 3. RMBS Issuance Amount by Originator

(ii) Product Type

Looking at the RMBS issuance amount (¥1,076.0 billion) by product type, bonds accounted for 82% (¥877.3 billion) of the total (see Chart 4).

Chart 4. RMBS Issuance Amount by Product Type 0

1 2 3 4

04/1H 04/2H 05/1H 05/2H 06/1H 06/2H 07/1H 07/2H 08/1H 08/2H 09/1H 09/2H 10/1H 10/2H 11/1H 11/2H 12/1H 12/2H 13/1H

Others

Nonbanks

Regional banks

Commercial /trust banks

Japan Housing Finance Agency

0 1 2 3 4

04/1H 04/2H 05/1H 05/2H 06/1H 06/2H 07/1H 07/2H 08/1H 08/2H 09/1H 09/2H 10/1H 10/2H 11/1H 11/2H 12/1H 12/2H 13/1H

Others

Bonds

(4)

(iii) Repayment Method

Looking at the RMBS issuance amount (¥1,076.0 billion) by repayment method, all repayments were pass-through repayments (see Chart 5).

Chart 5. RMBS Issuance Amount by Repayment Method

(iv) Spread at Issuance

The launch spread (difference between the RMBS coupon rate and Japanese government bond yield at time of fixing issuing conditions) for JHF RMBS (monthly issuance bonds) contracted to July and expanded in September 2013(see Chart 6).

Chart 6. JHF RMBS Launch Spread 0

1 2 3 4

04/1H 04/2H 05/1H 05/2H 06/1H 06/2H 07/1H 07/2H 08/1H 08/2H 09/1H 09/2H 10/1H 10/2H 11/1H 11/2H 12/1H 12/2H 13/1H

Not noted

Installment repayments

Lump sum repayments at maturity

Pass-through repayments

0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8

(5)

III. Issuance Trends by Product Type

Looking at the securitization product issuance amount (¥1,294.1 billion) by product type, bonds accounted for 72% (¥927.3 billion), followed by trust beneficiary rights with 22% (¥282.3 billion) (see Chart 7).

Chart 7. Securitization Product Issuance Amount by Product Type

IV. Issuance Trends by Repayment Method

Looking at the securitization issuance amount (¥1,294.1 billion) by repayment method, pass-through repayments accounted for 89% (¥1,145.9 billion) of the total. (see Chart 8).

Chart 8. Securitization Product Issuance Amount by Repayment Method

0 1 2 3 4 5 6

04/1H 04/2H 05/1H 05/2H 06/1H 06/2H 07/1H 07/2H 08/1H 08/2H 09/1H 09/2H 10/1H 10/2H 11/1H 11/2H 12/1H 12/2H 13/1H

0 1 2 3 4 5 6

04/1H 04/2H 05/1H 05/2H 06/1H 06/2H 07/1H 07/2H 08/1H 08/2H 09/1H 09/2H 10/1H 10/2H 11/1H 11/2H 12/1H 12/2H 13/1H

Others

Bonds

Trust beneficiary rights

Not noted

Installment repayments

Lump sum repayments at maturity

(6)

V. Issuance Trends by Planned/Average Term to Maturity

Looking at the securitization issuance amount (¥1,294.1 billion) by planned/average term to maturity, “Not noted” accounted for 94% (¥1,215.1 billion), followed by “5 year to 7 years” with 4% (¥50 billion) (see Chart 9).

Chart 9. Securitization Product Issuance Amount by Planned/Average Term to Maturity

VI. Issuance Trends by Credit Rating

Looking at the securitization issuance amount (¥1,294.1 billion) by credit rating, AAA accounted for 92% (¥1,185.1 billion (see Chart 10).

Chart 10. Securitization Product Issuance Amount by Credit Rating 0

1 2 3 4 5 6

04/1H 04/2H 05/1H 05/2H 06/1H 06/2H 07/1H 07/2H 08/1H 08/2H 09/1H 09/2H 10/1H 10/2H 11/1H 11/2H 12/1H 12/2H 13/1H

Not noted

7 years or more

5 years to 7 years

3 years to 5 years

1 year to 3 years

Under 1 year

1 2 3 4 5 6

Not noted

Short-term rating

CCC

B

BB

BBB

A

AA

参照

関連したドキュメント

In particular, we consider a reverse Lee decomposition for the deformation gra- dient and we choose an appropriate state space in which one of the variables, characterizing the

Kilbas; Conditions of the existence of a classical solution of a Cauchy type problem for the diffusion equation with the Riemann-Liouville partial derivative, Differential Equations,

自動車販売会社(2社) 自動車 自動車販売拠点設備 1,547 自己資金及び借入金 三菱自動車ファイナンス株式会社 金融 システム投資 他

Amount of Remuneration, etc. The Company does not pay to Directors who concurrently serve as Executive Officer the remuneration paid to Directors. Therefore, “Number of Persons”

As a result of the Time Transient Response Analysis utilizing the Design Basis Ground Motion (Ss), the shear strain generated in the seismic wall that remained on and below the

Lower Losses Power Semi’s Optimal Topologies Capacitors Thermal Design Magnetics.

電気事業会計規則に基づき、当事業年度末において、「原子力損害賠償補償契約に関する法律(昭和36年6月 17日

2.「注記事項 重要な会計方針 6.引当金の計上基準 (3)災害損失引当金 追加情報